|
DAVID ACHESON
b. May 8, 1769
d. Dec. 1, 1851
FAMILY
LETTERS IN A CIVIL WAR CENTURY included (for the most
part)
letters saved by old David Acheson's son, Alexander
Wilson
Acheson who was born in 1809.
Jane
M. Fulcher
February,
2000
***
The
bearer David Acheson intending to remove to N. America
this
therefore is to certify that he is a young man of a
sober
good conduct and son to Mr. Geo. Acheson an elder of
the
Seceding Congregation of Market Hill in the County Armagh
Ireland.
This is given under my hand this 10th of Apr. 1788.
Dav.
Arrot .... ....
***
Received
from David Atchison four pounds Sg in full for his
passage
on The Friendship Captain Rice for Philadelphia.
L4.0.0
Belfast 14 May 1788
For
Messrs W H ... & Stevenson
Charles
Fowler
[on
verso]
Receipt
Charles Fowler for passage in The Friendship
14th
May 1788
***
Rec'd
from John Acheson & Co. 2 hundred & seven Rations for
the
use of the Cornplanters party of Indians.
Given
under my hand this 11th Day Febry 1789
Washington
Town
Jonathan Zane
207
Rations at 7L 6.0.0
***
Rec'd
Pittsburgh Febr.16th 1789 of Mr. Jonathan Zane House[?]
accounts
against the United States for his and Indians as
Pilot
& for provisions furnished by Ebenezer Zane and John
Acheson--which
I promise to endeavor to have paid & in case
of
failure [to pay the various] contractors the said accts to
him
or his ... Richard
Butler
[Written
after this in a different hand]: Brigadier
Gen'l
under
Gen'l St. Clair. Killed in
the battle with the Indians
Nov.
1791.]
***
[The
following "statement" by David Acheson was probably
written
in 1817. According to
Alexander W. Acheson's
Appendix
to ACHESON -- A FAMILY HISTORY, p.51
In
the spring of 1886 when the Honorable Alexander
Murdoch
was preparing to remove from the residence
where
he had lived so long, he found among the
papers
of his father [also Alexander Murdoch] who
was
Prothonotary of the county from 1809-1819 a
"statement"
in the handwriting of David Acheson.]
David
Acheson arrived in the United States in 1788, a minor
and
a partner of his brother John Acheson, who had for some
time
before carried on a commercial establishment in Washing-
ton,
under the firm of John & David Acheson, and afterwards
under
the firm of John Acheson & Co., which copartnership
continued
until the decease of John Acheson, October 1791.
David
Acheson, during the lifetime of his brother, made two
voyages
in New Orleans and one to the West Indies,
besides
trading in the towns
erecting
northwest of the Ohio. In
the month of August 1790,
David
Acheson and the late Capt. Fowler of Pittsburgh,
freighted
a French vessel, then lying in the harbour of the
City
of New Orleans and as citizens of the United States,
shipped
on board a considerable quantity of flour to the
Island
of St. Domingo, This was
understood at the time to be
the
first cargo of flour ever shipped from New Orleans, at
least
to any foreign port.
The
ship and cargo arrived in good order at Cape Francis, now
Cape
[Hanny?, Horny?], where the flour was landed and sold on
account
of Messrs David Acheson & Co., citizens of the United
States,
by Messrs Perkins & [Marger? Morgan?] & Co. merchants
of
the Cape. It was indeed a
matter of some curiosity to the
Citizens
of Cape Francis upon learning that this cargo of
flour
having not only been shipped from New Orleans but had
actually,
before arrival & shipment from that port, been
conveyed
down the Ohio & Mississippi rivers, upwards of 2000
miles.
The
returns of this cargo of flour was shipped, from & in the
produce
of the said Island, to Philadelphia by David Acheson
&
Co. as citizens of the United States and their sold. Part
of
the coffee was sold to John Guier of the said City, Mercht
D
A about the last of Nov. 1791, when ascending the Ohio, on
his
way to Washington from Cincinnati, where he had been with
goods
and established a store on account of said concern
under
the management of Daniel Duffay, first heard the
melancholy
account of his brother's death, who died on his
way
to Philadelphia near the foot of Cove Mountain.
This
was an unexpected & trying event to a youth having
thereby
an extensive, complicated and embarrassed concern to
adjust
& settle. Many losses
had been sustained and a number
of
litigated cases; moreover his just claim as a Partner with
his
deceased brother was disputed, and upon which a suit was
brought
against him by John Hoge, Attorney in fact of the
widow
of John Acheson Dec.
Issue
made up in the Registers Court, in order to determine
this
matter and a special jury being selected for that
purpose
did finally determine this case at September term
1795
who "on their respective oaths say that they find that
David
Acheson, the Defendant, is a full and equal partner in
all
Estate real and personal."
His
deceased brother, John Acheson, prior to his coming to
the
U. S. had been engaged in business in Ireland, in which
he
had been unsuccessful. When
he left that country he also
left
considerable debts unsettled besides money due his
father,
George Acheson, which debt was paid after his decease
by
David Acheson, Administrator & Surviving Partner.
In
the year 1794 the late Thomas Acheson arrived in this
country
with regular powers of attorney authorizing him to
demand,
sue for, and recover from the Estate of John Acheson,
Dec'd,
considerable sums of money due and owing as aforesaid.
A
suit was accordingly brought by him against the estate for
the
recovery thereof and the matter in dispute left to three
men,
to wit, Dr. Absalom Baird, William Meetkirke, Esq., &
Col.
Gabriel Blackney, who after hearing the proofs and alle-
gations
of the parties, did determine and award that the
Estate
of John Acheson Dec'd was indebted to Thomas Acheson,
Attorney
in fact for George Acheson and others, the sum of
1460
pounds, which money David Acheson paid as Administrator
of
said Estate.
The
Administrator of the Estate of Joseph McCulloch Dec'd
exhibited
also a demand against the Estate of John Acheson
amounting
to $300 which was also left to men and by them
determined
and awarded to be just, which was paid by David
Acheson.
During
this moment of trial & perplexity D A was supported by
friends.
In James Ross, Esquire, he found a faithful and
honorable
counsellor, also to the late Judge Addison he feels
indebted,
not only for friendly & salutary advice received
from
him from the time of the decease of John Acheson during
all
the time of adjustment & settlement of said Estate. The
said
Judge Addison freely and voluntarily officiating and
acting
as a magistrate in taking depositions for the said
David
in the year 1794 & 1795 relative to the case then
depending
in the Court of Common Pleas, over which the said
Judge
presided "whether and how far the said David Acheson
was
a partner with his brother John Acheson."
Further
it appears on the 1st May 1794 when David Tait, a
witness
on behalf of D A, went before the Judge to make
deposition
relative to the said cause, before he administered
the
oath or subscribed the same, the said Judge in his own
proper
handwriting entering that
deposition & envincing
thereby
the utmost confidence in the honour, correctness, and
integrity
of D A. This circumstance
will doubtless satisfy
any
man that Judge Addison must have had the most exalted
opinion
of him.
Again
a considerable time after the determination of the
above
suits, to wit, in 1797 or 1798 or probably 1799, a
motion
was made, probably by Mr. Campbell, Atty for John
Hoge,
&c, in this Court of Common Pleas, and followed up by
considerable
arguments of counsel, to set aside the judge-
ments
obtained by Thomas Acheson & James McColloch against
D
A, as Administrator of the Estate of his brother, John
Acheson
Dec'd, alledging that D A had aided or facilitated in
obtaining
those judgements thereby wronging the widow & heirs
of
his deceased brother.
Doubtless
this subject was then agitated in consequence of
the
then unhappy political division which for the first time
divided
the citizens of this county. At
least such was the
opinion
of his friends. Judge
Addison, being intimately
acquainted
with the adjustment & settlement of said Estate
decided
that said Judgments "ought not, should not be set aside."
Soon
after David Acheson arrived at the age of twenty-one
years,
and two weeks after the trial and award of the jury,
finding
and awarding him to be an "equal partner in all
Estate
real & personal of his brother John Acheson," was he
for
the first time elected a Representative for the County of
Washington
in the General Assembly of Pennsylvania, and
second
on the return, having 1027 votes, accordingly attended
the
House and performed the duties of a member during the
Session
of 1795-96.
October
1796, was re-elected and highest on the return having
1819
votes, attended as a member during the Session 1796-97.
October
1797, was again re-elected and second on the return,
having
997 votes, and when attending to his duties as a
member
of the House, being his third Session, a petition was
presented
against his competency, alledging that he was an alien.
Before
the House came to a decision, or even to an
investigation
of the facts stated in the petition in order to
ascertain
the truth of what the petitioners alledged, David
Acheson
addressed a letter to George Lattimer, Esquire,
Speaker
of the House, resigning his seat as one of its
members,
which was accepted of by the House.
This then ended
this
matter, leaving the question of alienship still
undetermined.
That
no blame was attached to David Acheson, relative to this
transaction
by his constituents must be evident from their
again
electing him a Representative in 1804 and third on
return
having 817 votes, and accordingly served as a member
of
this House during the Session 1804-05.
David
Acheson in November 1805 moved with his family to the
City
of Philadelphia, where he lived till the spring of 1814,
when
he returned with his family again to Washington.
During
his
residence in the city, he enjoyed the confidence &
friendship
not only of a numerous & respectable circle of
friends
& acquaintances but also of the Representatives of
the
good people of this Commonwealth, by whom he was chosen a
director,
on behalf of this State, of the Philadelphia Bank.
He
was first elected in the year 1809 and continued every
year
afterwards until he left the City in 1814.
In this
institution
the State owns upwards of 500,000 dollars.
During
the late war with Great Britain Governor Snyder
appointed
him an agent on behalf of this Commonwealth to
negotiate
a loan in the City of Philadelphia for a Million of Dollars
agreeably
to an act of the General Assembly
authorizing
the Governor to borrow that sum. This
money was
accordingly
negotiated for and obtained from the Banks in the
City.
*
* *
Immediately
after the election of Governor Findlay in October
1817,
a project was set on foot in this County, even before
his
inauguration, in order to supplant the Prothonotary &
Register
by holding an election for the purpose of nominating
persons
to fill those offices.
This
scheme was at the time considered premature, evincing a
want
of confidence in the Chief Magistrate, who was but a few
weeks
elected and before he had entered upon the duties of
his
office; moreover, it was apprehended that such a
procedure,
if not counteracted, would have a tendency to
control
the Governor, contrary to the Constitution, which
invested
in him exclusively the right of appointment.
Alexander
Murdoch, Esq., and some others prevailed upon D A
to
wait upon the Committee of Vigilance in order to have an
address
signed & published against such election.
The paper
was
first presented to David Craig, Esq., who approved of
[illegible]...
Alexander Addison[?], Esq. D
A next waited on
John
Watson, Esquire. Mr. M
explained the object in view by
having
the address signed & published by the Committee, in
order
to counteract the election project and Mr. Watson
approved
and signed it.
The
other gentlemen on the Committee, Gen'l Hamilton, Col.
Sam'l
Hill & Isaac Kerr, Esq., did not sign it.
The General
expressed
himself decidedly against any measure that would
have
a tendency to control the Governor in his right of
appointment.
He considered the election project improper but
was
of opinion it could not succeed; therefore, considered an
address
from the Committee also unnecessary and improper and
would
but have a contrary effect to what it was intended.
Col.
Samuel Hill seemed to favor the scheme of nominating
persons
to fill those offices by election, consequently on
that
score refused his signature, observing however, as the
subject
appeared of some importance, he would consider of it
and
come to Washington in a few days.
Isaac
Kerr, Esq., was not called upon. It
was understood
however
that he disapproved of any interference with the
Governor
in his right of making appointments.
[The
statement we have in David Acheson's handwriting ends
here.
The transcript of it included in the APPENDIX to
ACHESON--A
FAMILY HISTORY stops at the centered asterisks
above.]
***
[To
judge from the date, 188.., the following letter and the
1888
certified copy of David Acheson's naturalization record
were
in response to an inquiry from E. F. Acheson.]
Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania
Library
Department
William
H. Egle, M.D., Librarian
Joseph
R. Orwig, Assistant Librarian
Harrisburg
188...
[E.
F. Acheson, Esq.]
Washington,
Penna.
Dear
Sir: From the Proceedings
of the H. of Rep. of December
13,
1797, I find the following relative to the Election of
David
Acheson, Esquire: A
petition from sundry inhabitants
of
the county of Washington, stating that they have good
reason
to believe David Acheson, Esquire, Member of this
House
from the said county, is not a citizen of the United
States,
and praying an investigation of the case, which
together
with papers accompanying the same was read, and
Ordered
to lie on the table. On
motion, Ordered, that the
clerk
be directed to furnish the sitting member with a copy
of
the said petition, and of such papers accompanying the
same
as he may require.
On
December 14th, appear the following minutes:
The petition
of
a number of the inhabitants of Washington county, relative
to
the Election of David Acheson, Esquire, read yesterday,
was
read the second time. A
Motion was made by Mr. Waln,
seconded
by Mr. Taylor, and adopted as follows, viz:
Resolved,
That the petition from several citizens from the
county
of Washington, complaining of the election of David
Acheson,
together with the papers accompanying the same, be
referred
to a committee, that the said committee shall have
authority
to send for persons and papers, and that they
report
a statement of facts for the information of the House.
Ordered,
That Mr. Hemphill, Mr. Stover, Mr. Smilie, Mr.
Mulhenberg,
Mr. Kelly, Mr. Hendricks and Mr. Welles, be a
committee
for the purpose expressed in the said resolution.
The
committee to whom we referred the 14th instant, the
petition
against the election of David Acheson, Esquire, with
sundry
papers accompanying the same, made report, which was
read
as follows, viz:
That
the said David Acheson is a native of Ireland, that
he
came into this country since the declaration of
Independence
to wit, about the year 1788 or 1789...
That
it appeared to your committee that the said David
Acheson
within the last year past, acknowledged that he had
not
become a citizen by taking the oath of allegiance as
prescribed
by the laws of this State or of the United States,
and
that the said David Acheson said he did not deem it
necessary
to take such oath.
It
also appeared to your committee that the said David
Acheson
hath sat as a member in the legislature of this State
the
two years last past, and took and subscribed the usual
oaths
of office.
Your
committee further report that the said David
Acheson
declined to give any information to your committee
respecting
the above facts.
Ordered
to lie on the table.
On
Saturday Dec. 23d, 1797: A
letter addressed to the
Speaker
inclosing a certificate of the naturalization of
David
Acheson Esquire, on the 28th day of November last,
and
signed John Hoge, was read, together with the said
certificate,
and ordered to lie on the table.
On
Monday, Jan. 1st, 1798, the following proceedings in the
case
transpired:
A
motion was made by Mr. Hemphill seconded by Mr.
Carpenter,
and read, as follows, viz:
Resolved,
That the Constitution of Penn'a declares that
no
person shall be a Representative who shall not have been a
citizen
and inhabitant of the State three years preceding his
election.
Resolved,
That no foreigner can become a citizen of this
State
until he is naturalized agreeably to law.
Resolved,
That it has been made to appear to this House
that
David Acheson (as sitting member) is a native of
Ireland;
that he came into this country since the declaration
of
independence, and has never been naturalized until the
18th
of November, 1797, at which time on his own application
to
the District Court of the United States, he was
naturalized
according to law.
Resolved,
That the said David Acheson was not at the
time
of his election a citizen of this State, and therefore
not
qualified to serve as a member of the House of
Representatives
of Pennsylvania.
Ordered
to lie on the table.
On
motion, Ordered, That Wednesday the 10th instant be
assigned
for the second reading of the resolutions contained
in
the said motion, and also of the report of the committee
appointed
to enquire into, and make a statement of facts
relative
to the citizenship of David Acheson, and that they
be
the order for that day.
On
Thursday Jan. the 11th appears the following:
A letter
addressed
to the Speaker, and signed by John Hoge, one of the
petitioners
for the investigation of the legality of the
election
of David Acheson, Esquire, praying to be heard by
counsel
on the said question, was read and on motion, and by
special
order the same was read the second time, and the
prayer
thereof granted.
A
Motion was made by Mr. Smilie, and seconded by Mr. Leib,
to
postpone the consideration of the Motion make by Mr.
Hemphill,
seconded by Mr. Carpenter, and read the first
instant,
and the report of the committee appointed to inquire
into
and make a statement of facts relative to the citizen-
ship
of David Acheson, Esquire, until Tuesday next.
On the
question,
"Will the House agree to the same?" is was deter-
mined
in the negative. A Motion
was made by Mr. Acheson, and
seconded
by Mr. Forrest, to postpone the said last mentioned
Motion
and report until tomorrow. A
Motion was then made by
Mr.
Evans and seconded by Mr. Waln, to postpone the said
Motion,
in order to introduce the following, viz: Resolved,
That
David Acheson shall tomorrow morning lay upon the table
of
this House, a full statement of facts relative to his
qualifications
for a seat in this House. On
the question,
"Will
the House agree to postpone for the purpose aforesaid?"
it
was determined in the affirmative.
And on the question,
"Will
the House agree to the resolution?" the yeas and nays
were
called by Messrs. Forrest and Evans and are as follows:
Yeas
68 Nays 5. So it was determined in the affirmative,
and
the resolution was adopted. On
Motion of Mr. Evans,
seconded
by Mr. Leib, Ordered, That the Motion made by Mr.
Hemphill,
seconded by Mr. Carpenter, and read the first
instant,
and the report of the committee appointed to inquire
into
and make a statement of facts relative to the citizen-
ship
of David Acheson, Esquire, be postponed until Saturday
next,
and that they be ordered for that day.
On
Friday, January the 12th appears the following:
A letter
addressed
to the Speaker, and signed David Acheson, resigning
his
seat in the House, was read and ordered to lie on the
table.
On
Saturday, January the 13th, a Motion was made by Mr.
Everly
seconded by Mr. Hoge, and read as follows, viz:
Resolved,
That this House accept the resignation of David
Acheson
of his seat in the Legislature of Pennsylvania; but
such
acceptance is in no wise to be deemed or construed to
dispense
with any of the requisites necessary to qualify any
person
to a seat in the Legislature. And
on Motion, and by
special
Order, the same was read the second time.
A Motion
was
made by Mr. Hemphill and seconded by Mr. Evans, to
postpone
the further consideration of the said resolution in
order
to introduce the following as a substitute, viz:
Resolved,
That the resignation of David Acheson, be accepted,
but
that such acceptance, shall not be deemed as an implied
acknowledgment
that the said David Acheson is qualified to
serve
as a member of this House, or that it is not necessary
for
a foreigner coming to this country since the Declaration
of
Independence to take an oath or affirmation of allegiance,
&c.
and to be naturalized three years previous to his elec-
tion,
to render such person qualified to serve as a member as
aforesaid,
or that the papers on the table are not sufficient
to
prove the want of citizenship of the aforesaid David
Acheson.
On the question, "Will the House agree to postpone
for
the said purpose?" it was determined in the negative.
A
Motion was made by Mr. Ball and seconded by Mr. Heron, to
postpone
the further consideration of the said resolution in
order
to introduce the following as a substitute, viz:
Whereas,
This House has reason to believe that David Acheson,
chosen
to represent the County of Washington in the House of
Representatives
of this Commonwealth, was not at the time of
his
Election, a citizen of this State or of the United
States,
therefore, Resolved, That the resignation of the said
David
Acheson, be accepted. On
the question, "Will the House
agree
to postpone for the said purpose?" it was determined in
the
negative.
The
original Motion recurring, a Motion was made by Mr.
Waln,
and seconded by Mr. Kelly to amend the same by striking
out
all that follows the word "construed" and inserting in
place
thereof the following, viz: "to
recognize a right in
the
said David Acheson to a seat in this House."
On the
question
"Will the House agree to the amendment?: is was
determined
in the affirmative and the resolution as amended
was
adopted.
***
U.
S. District Court
Eastern
District of Penna
Certified
copy
of
the Petition and
Record
of admission
of
David Acheson, Esquire
of
the State of Penna
as
a citizen of the
United
States
To
the Honorable Richard Peters, Judge of the Pennsylvania
District
holding a District Court in and for the same
The
petition of David Acheson of the State of Pennsylvania,
Esquire
Respectfully
sheweth
That
on the twenty-ninth day of January in the year 1795 your
petitioner
resided within the limits and under the jurisdic-
tion
of the United States, and for upwards of five years
previously
thereto----- that he hath
resided two years at
least
within and under the jurisdiction of the same, and one
year
at least within the State of Pennsylvania where this
Court
is held, of which he is willing to make oath; and also
that
he will support the Constitution of the United States
and
that he doth absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure
all
allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate,
state
or sovereignty whereof he was before a citizen or sub-
ject,
and moreover is ready to make appear to the satisfac-
tion
of the honorable Court that during this said term of two
years
he has behaved as a man of good moral character
attached
to the Constitution of the United States and well
disposed
to the good order and happiness of the same, and
prays
that he may, on taking such oath and making proof of
the
facts above set forth to the satisfaction of the Court,
be
admitted a citizen of the United States, and the proceed-
ings
herein be recorded by the Clerk of the said Court
agreeably
to the directions of the Act of Congress of the
United
States entitled, "An Act to establish an uniform Rule
of
Naturalization and to repeal the Act heretofore passed on
that
Subject." passed on the said twenty-ninth day of January
1795
And
your Petitioner will pray,
Philadelphia
28 Nov. 1797
David Acheson
David
Acheson, the Petitioner above named
being
duly sworn on his solemn oath, deposeth and says that
on
the twenty-ninth day of January in the year 1795, he
resided
within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the
United
States and for upwards of five years previously
thereto,
that he hath resided two years at least within the
United
States and under the jurisdiction of the same and one
year
at least within the State of Pennsylvania, that he will
support
the Constitution of the United States, and that he
doth
absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all
allegiance
and fidelity to any foreign Prince, Potentate,
State
or Sovereignty where he was before a citizen or
subject,
particularly the King of Great Britain, and he hath
not
borne any hereditary title or order of nobility.
David
Acheson
Sworn
in open court
Nov.
28, 1797
Dav.
Caldwell
Dep.
Clk. Dist. Ct.
Peter
Wallace Gallaudet
of
the City of Philadelphia, Merchant, being duly sworn on
his
solemn oath deposeth and says that he has known David
Acheson,
the Petitioner above named residing within the
limits
and under the jurisdiction of the United States for
the
space of eight years and upwards on the twenty-ninth day
of
January 1795, and that he hath resided two years at least
within
the United States and under the jurisdiction of the
same
and one year at least within the State of Pennsylvania,
&
moreover that he hath behaved as a man of good moral
character
attached to the Constitution of the United States
and
well disposed to the good order and happiness of the
same.
Peter
W. Gallaudet
Sworn
in open court
Nov.
28, 1797
Dav.
Caldwell
Dep.Clk.Dist.Ct.
Endorsed
No. 138
Petition
of David Acheson
to
become a citizen
of
U. S.
1797--Nov.
28
Read
and filed
&
admitted, &c
In
the District Court of the United States for the
Pennsylvania
District---
And
now November 28, A.D. 1797 David
Acheson, of the State
of
Pennsylvania, Esquire, appears in Court and presents his
petition
(No.138) setting forth &c. and praying to be
admitted
to become a citizen of the United States, and the
said
David Acheson having made the proofs, taken the oath,
and
complied with the requisites prescribed by law, is
accordingly
admitted a citizen of the United States.
The
United States of America, Eastern District of Pennsyl-
vania,
I, Charles S. Lincoln, Clerk of the District Court of
the
United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
do
hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing is a true
and
faithful copy of the Petition of David Acheson, Esquire,
of
the State of Pennsylvania praying to be admitted to become
a
citizen of the United States.--And also of the record of
his
admission now remaining among the records of the said
Court
in my office.
In
testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name and
affixed
the seal of the said Court at Philadelphia, this
Fourth
day of April in the year of our Lord one thousand,
eight
hundred and eighty-eight--and in the one hundred and
twelfth
year of the Independence of the United States.
Charles
S. Lincoln
Clerk,
District Court U. S.
***
(Circulaar)
Sir,
AT
a Meeding held in the Town of Washington on Tuesday,
the
27th August.--We were appointed with other Gentlemen from
different
parts of the County, a Committee for the purpose of
giving
information, or drafting an address as circumstances
might
require to the Citizens of the County, touching the
approaching
Election.
And
whereas, we are fully impressed with the idea that
there
appears the most serious aspect of a division, of the
Republican
interest as it regards the election of Members of
Assembly.--Therefore,
in order to combine the threatened
division
at this momentous crisis, we have thought it advis-
able
to request the citizens of each Township, throughout the
County
to appoint in each, a citizen to represent them in a
general
meeting to be held at the House of John Scott, in the
Town
of Washington, on Monday the 30th inst. at Eleven
o'Clock
A. M.
We
trust, Sir, that you will lend all your aid, to
accomplish
the great and desirable object we have all in
view,
a Republican representation.
Henry
Taylor,
David
Acheson,
John
Israel,
John
Cloyd.
September,
18 1799. [handwritten]:
James Ashbrook
[At
the top of the above circular probably in David Acheson's
hand]:
Origin of the Delegate System in Washington Co.
[On
the back of the above circular in the same hand]:
Circular,
Letter, respecting app't Delegates,
to meet in a
Gen'l
Meeting in Washington Sep'r---1799.
This communication
was
the beginning of the System of delegation.
***
[Journal
entries of David Acheson]
Eliza
Young Acheson, born on Monday night the 10th February
1800
about half after eleven o'Clock P. M.---Mrs. Acheson
departed
this life the 27 February half after 8 o'Clock P. M.
1800,
Thursday. Interred on
Saturday following at
Canonsburgh
Meetinghouse half after one o'clock----
Extract
of a letter D A to his father
"Altho
I am far separated from you, yet I never cease to
think
with this delightful sensation of affection of the most
beloved
and best of parents when I reflect and think of the
care
and attention that you bestowed upon me, the pains you
took
to instruct my youth in every good and virtuous thing.
I
often wonder how it's possible that children should ever be
ungrateful
to their parents. For my
part my bosom ought to
be
filled with gratitude and love toward you.
Indeed I am
confident
that I never can repay what you have done for me,
but
to know that I still retain your affection and your
blessing
will repay more than thousand-fold for all I ever
done
for you. May I then
[illegible], shall I not expect
that
my dear father will write me from time to time and
above
all that he will pray for his ever affectionate son.
D.
A.
Philadelphia
June
25th, 1800
D.
Acheson Memorandum Voyage
[Corner of note page gone]
Left
Washington November 1, 1802 [arrived] at Philadelphia
the
9th. Sailed from thence the
16th and from the Cape
Delaware
23d--arrived at the cove Cork, 22d, December.
After
performing
twenty days quarantine, got ashore the 11th [?]
January
1803 and arrived same evening in the City of Cork.
Second
day after, left the City in the mail coach for Dublin
by
the way of Clonmell, Killkenny, Carlow, passing through
the
counties of Cork, Tipperary, Waterford, Killkenny,
Carlow,
Killdare and part of Dublin. Remained
in the city of
Dublin
3 days. Left it in the
Drogheada coach, from thence
(Drogheada)
in a postchaise passed through Dundalk, Newry to
Market
Hill, having from Dublin travelled through the
counties
of Dublin, Westmouth, Louth and south part of Down
and
Armagh.
Arrived
at Market Hill at my Father's where remained ten
days,
took horse and rode through Armagh, Killalay, Colladon,
Aughnacloy,
Augher, Clogher, Five mile town, Louthiestown[?],
passing
through the counties of Armagh, Monaghan, Tyrone, and
Fermanagh.
Returned by Stewartstown, Fermanagh to Augher,
&c.
to Market Hill, where I remained till the last of
February.
Sailed
from Warrenpoint March 5th for Liverpool.
Same
evening
it blew a gale of wind from N. E. The
consequence
was
were obliged to bear away for Wales.
Next day made
Beaumaris,
or Blue Morris, in Anglesey. Went
to see the
castle
built by Edward the 1st. From
thence went by land to
Bangor
7 m, to Conway 15 m, which is a very ancient town and
considerable
strength. The Walls is
still standing, with
castles
at right angles.
From
thence to Abergally 8 m, thence to the City St.Austen
9m,
to Holywell 10m. A
considerable manufacturing town
spinning
cotton &c. A great part
of the way between St.
Austen
and Holywell we passed over a bed of copper ore and
many
miners at work. To Flint 7
m. Here we crossed the
mouth
of the Dee to Pasgate, being seven miles across.
It is
here
commonly called Chester Bay. From
thence to Liverpool
7
m, where we arrived about sundown.
Set
out next day for Manchester in a stage coach, through
Warrington.
After remaining there about a week, returned to
Liverpool
March 17th. Sailed from
thence in the ship Ross
19th
& arrived at Philad'a May 4th 1803---
D.
Acheson
***
[The
Hannah Acheson who wrote the following letter was a
daughter
of David's deceased brother, John Acheson.
David
was
her guardian. Some of the
spelling in her letter has
been
interpreted and punctuation has been added.]
Glassdrumond
May 5th 1804
Dear
uncle
I
have the pleasure to inform you that I am quite
well.
Never was better in my life and it is my censere wish
to
go to you. The idea adss
[adds] to my felicity. What
then
would be the reality do.
Our
friends is all well. James
Harshy[?] and family says
the
[they] will go with me. Hannah
is maried about three
months
ago to a William Mcnaly and wishes you would look out
a
place for them. My mother
says she will go along with us.
Give
my kind love to uncle Thomas and his Lady and little
Nancy.
I supose the next news we get is your got maried.
I
wonder
uncle Thomas does not write.
Be
asured I will not be offended at any advice.
On the
contrary
I shall always rejoice at hearing from you.
Think
not
that I indulge a reping [repining] spirit.
I will rest
satisfied
with the share of happiness aloted me and content
myself
with oping [opening] my heart to you on all occasions.
Excuse
my bad [illegible]. I now
[know] you will lauf
[laugh]
at it.
Farewell
my dear uncle. To merit the
continuance of your
love
and esteem is
the
first wish of
your
ever dutiful
and
affectionate niece
Hannah
Acheson
[P.S.
written along the edge of first page]: I supose I would
be
very hapy with uncle but I would not wish to depend on him
for
every thing.
[Hannah
Acheson came to the United States in 1807 in charge
of
the Rev. Thomas Campbell. Apparently
her mother did not
come.
David Acheson was married again October 31, 1805, to
Mary
Wilson.]
***
[The
following two documents, though not dated, are surely
from
David's years in Philadelphia. They
are addressed to
"Mr.
David Acheson."]
Sir
We
request you will go to the Custom House this morning,
to
be qualified to the ownership of the Revenge.
A
prize having arrived here renders it absolutely
necessary
that the qualification shall take place previous
to
entering the report. [report?
result? other?]
Yrs
resply
Howell
& Shaw
Monday
Morning
Agents
***
Your
company is particularly requested to meet a number of
your
select friends, this evening precisely at Candlelight,
at
Poles Auction Room No. 32
Dock Street. You will
please
not
to fail attending.---Knock at the dwelling house door.
Monday
***
The
publications in the "Reporter" under the signature of
"Junius"
reflecting on Mr. D. Acheson were made under the
excitement
occasioned by a warm public contest about the
appointment
of a Judge, and under the impression that he was
the
author of the publications in the "Examiner" under the
signature
of "Democrat." It
now appears that he was not the
author
of "Democrat." I,
therefore, acknowlege my regret at
having
made those publications reflecting on Mr. Acheson, and
that
they were made under mistaken impressions.----
Th.
M. T. McKennan
June
4th 1819
***
Rec'd
Nov. 22, 1837 of D. Acheson three hundred and twenty
three
33/100 dollars on account of Rent of House in which he
now
resides----
$323.33
Alex'r Wilson
[For
an account of David Acheson's financial difficulties in
the
late 1820s and early 1830s see FAMILY LETTERS IN A CIVIL
WAR
CENTURY. His cousin
Alexander Wilson helped.]
***
Philad'a
4 month[?] 1840 Rec'd of David Acheson
One
hundred dollars for passage in the cabin of the Ship
"T.
P. Cope" for Liverpool. [May
1840]
Henry
& Alfred Cope
***
NORTH
& SOUTH AMERICAN
COFFEE
HOUSE
June
10th 1840
Admit
Mr. D. Atcheson
of Washington
for one month
Thos.
Moorhead
P.T.O
Market
Hill 16 April 1841
Received
from David Atcheson, Esq'r, formerly of America but
now
of Glass Drumond, County Armagh, Ireland, the full sum of
twenty
pounds, the which said sum my brother James Ahrert[?]
handed
to the said David Atcheson, Esq'r. for my use and
which
said sum I have now received
William
Ahrert[?]
***
Rec'd
Liverpool May 14th 1841 of Mr. Acheson the sum of
twenty
one pounds for Passage to Philad'a
Henry
S. Brown
L
21
***
[There
are many David Acheson business papers which I have
not
transcribed. They have been
photocopied and could be
assembled
in that form if need be. Jane
M. Fulcher]
Captain David Acheson -
Civil War
Washington County History Pages
|